How this report was compiled

A site entered the dataset if it appeared in the top organic search results for the main “OnlyFans agency” query in that country at the time of measurement. The sample is therefore “what a creator sees when they search”, not a census of every agency that exists.

• Queries used: the local-language equivalent of “OnlyFans agency” plus the country — for example “agencia OnlyFans España”, “agence OnlyFans”, “agenzia OnlyFans”, “OnlyFans management agency UK”, “OnlyFans management agency” (US), “agencia OnlyFans Argentina”; and, for the 28 August extension, “agência OnlyFans” / “agência de OnlyFans Brasil”, “OnlyFans agency Canada” / “OnlyFans management agency Toronto”, “OnlyFans agency Australia” / “OnlyFans management Sydney Melbourne agency”, “agencia OnlyFans Colombia”, “agencia OnlyFans Perú”, “agencia OnlyFans Ecuador”, “agencia OnlyFans Venezuela”, “agencia OnlyFans Chile”, “agencia OnlyFans Bolivia”, “agencia OnlyFans Uruguay”, “agencia OnlyFans República Dominicana”, with “management” and “mejor agencia” variants.
• Search sources: Google results by country phrase; Bing where its index returned usable results (Bing’s adult-content filtering made it unreliable in several markets). Rankings were recorded 24–25 August 2026. For the 28 August extension the sources were weaker: a US-based web search index queried with local-language phrases (not results geolocated from the country); Bing returned unrelated results in all eleven countries and was discarded; DuckDuckGo worked for Canada and for one Brazilian query and returned an anti-bot challenge elsewhere. Rankings for the extension were recorded on 28 August 2026. Details: how these markets were searched.
• Depth: the top nine to ten organic results per country, after removing duplicates. Non-agency results that ranked in that window (a comparator, a press listicle, a software vendor’s directory) were reviewed for context; two are counted in the European set of 33, the directory is not counted in the US set. In the extension, four non-agency results that ranked (a classified ad and a guide in Ecuador, an empty blog in Venezuela, a template site in the Dominican Republic) are included and labelled; multi-market agencies were verified once in full and referenced in each further market with only the country-specific data.
• Countries covered: Spain, France, Italy, United Kingdom, United States, Argentina (first edition, 25–27 August 2026); Brazil, Canada, Australia, Colombia, Peru, Ecuador, Venezuela, Chile, Bolivia, Uruguay, Dominican Republic (extension, 28 August 2026) — 17 in total. Other markets (Mexico and others) were measured for rankings but their agencies were not reviewed site by site and are not part of this dataset.

142 market entries (86 distinct websites) in 17 countries: 33 in Europe (Spain 10, France 8, United Kingdom 8, Italy 7), 7 in the United States, 68 in Latin America (Argentina 6, Colombia 9, Peru 7, Ecuador 9, Venezuela 7, Chile 10, Bolivia 5, Uruguay 7, Dominican Republic 8), 12 in Brazil, 11 in Canada and 11 in Australia.

Two agencies appear in more than one regional set because they rank in more than one market under different pages: AROA (UK page, US home, Spanish version for Argentina) and TDM (UK and US). They are counted once per market, as they were encountered, which is how the source studies were compiled and how the headline “46” was formed. The headline counts of rate-publishers (2) and offline sites (6) are not affected by this, because those sites appear once each.

Extension of 28 August 2026. The same convention applies: an agency ranking in several markets is counted once per market. This matters more in Latin America, where a few multi-country sites account for many entries — onlyfans-agencia.com has a country page in Argentina and in all eight Spanish-speaking markets added (9 entries); Dedalo Agency appears in 5 markets; TuAgenciaOFM, Mi Agencia OnlyFans, BraveGirls, AROA, agenciaonlyfans.online and Elite Models each in several. Of the 96 extension entries, 44 are domains that had not appeared in the first edition; the dataset therefore has 142 market entries and 86 distinct websites (42 in the first edition, 44 added). Headline figures that could be inflated by repetition are stated on a distinct-website basis: 7 distinct agencies publish a commission figure, range or cap (17 market entries). Offline, parked or unfinished sites in the extension (15) are listed per country but were not included in the studies’ verified counts, unlike the first edition, where the 6 such sites sit inside the 46; the world total of 21 adds both.

Each site was opened and read in full — home, services, pricing or FAQ, legal or terms pages, footer, and structured data where present. Nothing was requested from the agencies, no calls were made, and no forms were submitted.

1. Accessibility check. If the domain did not load, the DNS record was checked. “Not accessible” means the domain did not resolve (NXDOMAIN), returned a hosting error, or served a registrar parking page.
2. Commission. We searched every page for a numeric percentage or fee. The exact wording used in place of a figure was recorded (“custom %”, “explained in the first call”, “revenue split”, and so on). A rate published only inside terms and conditions counts as published.
3. Legal identity. Registered company name, company or VAT/tax number, registration country and physical address, as shown anywhere on the site. A legal form without a number (for example “… LLC” in a footer) is recorded as a name only; a street address without a company is recorded as an address only.
4. Self-description and claims. Phrases such as “#1”, “best”, “leading”; creator counts; years in business; team size; revenue or growth cases. Recorded verbatim or in close translation, always labelled as self-reported.
5. Contract visibility (US and Argentina). Whether contract terms can be read on the site before a sales call. “Month-to-month” or “exit anytime” statements without a readable document were recorded as not visible.
6. Local-market content (France, Argentina). France: whether the agency also manages MYM. Argentina: whether the site publishes country-specific tax and payment content (AFIP/ARCA, monotributo, factura E, Payoneer, USDT). Extension (28 August): the same question per country — Brazil (Pix, MEI/CNPJ, Wise/Payoneer), Canada (CRA, GST/HST), Australia (ABN, GST), Colombia (DIAN, Nequi/Bancolombia), Peru (SUNAT, Yape/Plin, BCP), Ecuador (SRI, dollarisation), Venezuela (SENIAT, Zelle/USDT), Chile (SII, bank names), Bolivia (SIN/NIT, Binance P2P), Uruguay (BPS/IRPF, BROU/Prex), Dominican Republic (DGII, bank names) — and whether the local tax ID of the market (CNPJ, NIT, RUC, RIF, RUT, RNC, Canadian corporation number, ABN/ACN) is published.

Published

Readable on the agency’s own public website at the verification date, without contacting the agency.

Not published

Not found on the site. It does not mean the agency has no rate, no company or no results — only that a creator cannot read it before making contact.

Self-reported

A figure the agency publishes about itself (creators, revenue, growth cases, years). Reproduced as a claim; not verified by us.

Not accessible

Domain does not resolve, returns a hosting error, or is parked. The site may have existed earlier; only its search-result title remained.

Visibly unfinished

A live site whose own elements show it is incomplete — for example a counter at “0 models under management” or unfilled template text in a testimonial block.

Range cited publicly

A commission band published by a third party or by an agency about the sector in general, not about itself. In this edition: 30–50% for full-service management, from the French comparator OF Master and from OF Management Agency’s Argentina page. Also cited in the extension, as general figures: 30–50% by Louna’s Models (English version) and 40–60% by Mi Agencia OnlyFans; an AF Marketing blog post that ranked in Peru cites 20–40%.

The dataset describes what is publicly disclosed, at a point in time, by the sites that rank. It does not measure service quality, earnings, or how many creators each agency actually works with.

• Self-reported figures were not independently verified. Creator counts, revenue, years in business and case studies are reproduced as the agencies state them.
• “Not published” is not “false”. Agencies may disclose rates and contracts on a first call or by email. The report measures pre-contact transparency only.
• Search-visible sample. Agencies that do not rank for the main query in their country are not included. Rankings differ by device, location and date; the ranking snapshot is from 24–25 August 2026 for the first edition and 28 August 2026 for the extension, where the index was not geolocated by country (see selection criteria). Positions in the extension are “who appears for those queries”, not a national ranking.
• Point in time. Websites change. Offline domains may come back; unfinished sites may be completed; rates may be added or removed. Each table states its verification date.
• Mixed entries. The European count of 33 includes two reference sites (a comparator and a press listicle) and one redirecting domain, as they were part of the results reviewed. Excluding them, 30 distinct European agency sites were accessible or offline. The headline “46” follows the dataset as compiled; readers may recount under their own criteria using the tables. The extension adds four labelled non-agency results (Ecuador: a classified ad and a guide; Venezuela: an empty blog; Dominican Republic: a template site).
• Sites built entirely in JavaScript. In the extension, sites whose text is rendered by JavaScript (for example onlymodels.ca, youonly.com.br) were read from their source code or blog pages, as a scripted browser was not available. Where a figure could not be read without JavaScript (for example a fee FAQ, or counters that show “0+” in the HTML), the table says so and records nothing.
• Repetition across markets. The market-entry count (142) counts a multi-country agency once per market it ranks in; the distinct-website count (86) and the distinct rate-publisher count (7) remove that repetition. Both are stated wherever a headline figure could be affected.
• Commission bases differ. A percentage “of billed revenue” (gross) and a percentage “of net income” (after the platform fee) are not directly comparable; both published rates are reproduced with their stated basis.
• Language. Sites were read in Spanish, French, Italian and English; quotations are translated closely but are not official translations.
• Publisher interest. The publisher operates an agency in this market. See the About & disclosure page. No agency was excluded or included on that basis; the sample is defined by search rankings alone.

Any agency named in the dataset, and any reader, may request a correction by writing to press@creatoragencyreport.com. If a site has changed since the verification date, we re-verify and update the table with a dated note; the original observation and date remain visible.

• Corrections are made against what the site publishes, not against statements sent by email — if an agency now publishes its rate or its company number, the table is updated to say so, with the new verification date.
• We do not remove agencies from the dataset on request; the sample is defined by search results at the time of measurement.
• Changes are listed in a dated change log at the bottom of this page.

• 28 August 2026 — First edition published. Verification windows: Europe 25 Aug, United States 26 Aug, Argentina 27 Aug 2026.
• 28 August 2026 (extension) — Eleven countries added, verified 28 Aug 2026: Brazil, Canada, Australia, Colombia, Peru, Ecuador, Venezuela, Chile, Bolivia, Uruguay, Dominican Republic (96 market entries; 44 websites new to the dataset). New page: Findings by region — Latin America, Brazil, Canada & Australia. Headline figures recalculated: 142 market entries, 86 distinct websites, 7 distinct agencies publishing a commission figure/range/cap, 21 offline/parked/unfinished sites, 17 countries. The first-edition tables, pattern notes and checklist are unchanged; the disclosure arithmetic (“one of three agencies out of 47”) was updated to the new count.

Back to the report Cite this report